Moncton Forum

Anything goes on the Greater Moncton Forum!
Welcome to Moncton Forum Sign in or Join | Help
Forums Active Topics Who Is Online? Hall of Fame Forum Rules Chat! Classifieds

Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

Last post 04-03-2007, 7:30 AM by notme. 8 replies.
Related on YouTube Sort Posts:
  •  04-01-2007, 5:16 AM

    Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101



         

    ezyEdit - ASP Website Portal

                                                                          

    PaladinLogo.jpg

     

    canada, canadian search engine, free email, canada news 

    Nunavut takes a page from Bill 101

     

     

     

    BOB WEBER
    CP

    2007 04 01

    In a move reminiscent of laws that changed Quebec forever, the government of Nunavut has introduced language legislation that would enforce the use of Inuktitut in public places from restaurants to schools to offices.

    "What we'd like to do here is protect the Inuit language for the future," said Louis Tapardjuk, minister of culture, language, education and youth.

    "It will have an impact on all our children, families, communities, businesses, schools and governments."

    Tapardjuk has introduced two language bills into the territorial legislature.

    The Official Languages Act declares French, English and Inuktitut to be Nunavut's official languages. The Inuit Language Protection Bill is intended to ensure the three languages remain on an equal footing by mandating the use of Inuktitut for signs and services.

     

    A stop sign reads in English, and Inuktitut, the native language of the Inuit people, who recently began to self govern their native land. Nunavut, means 'our land' in native Inuktitut. The territory was carved out of the Northwest Territories on April 1, 1999 as part of a 1993 land claims settlement

    A stop sign reads in English, and Inuktitut, the native language of the Inuit people, who recently began to self govern their native land. Nunavut, means 'our land' in native Inuktitut. The territory was carved out of the Northwest Territories on April 1, 1999 as part of a 1993 land claims settlement

     

    Map of Canada with Nunavut highlighted

    Nunavut
    The word "Nunavut" in Inuktitut syllabics

    The proposed law says organizations providing "essential services" would have to use Inuktitut signage "at least equally prominent with any other signage used."

    Burton said it was based on research collected between 2000 and 2005 and does not take into account more recent studies showing the trend is accelerating, particularly in icy regions like Greenland and the Canadian Arctic.

    Burton said the general public's impression is that the planet is facing a general, gradual warming trend.

    "I prefer to think of it as the destabilization of the atmosphere," Burton said in a telephone interview from his office at the University of Toronto.

    "It's a fairly widely expressed view that there are more recent research results, particularly in the ice business, that have not been adequately taken on board by this Working Group One report.

    "There is quite a widespread view that things are actually worse than it says."

    Burton is recognized by colleagues as a pioneer in thinking about adaptation to climate change, and the vulnerability of human societies to changes imposed by shifting weather and temperature regimes.

    He is one of the authors of a follow-up report that will be released next Friday in Brussels by Working Group Two of the climate change panel.

    The report will address impacts of climate change, the need to adapt to increasingly disruptive weather systems, and the vulnerability of human societies and ecosystems in light of those changes.

    It is expected to create an even greater sensation than the February greenhouse gas report because it focuses on human and environmental disasters that follow from global warming.

    Leaks of details from draft versions of the report paint a gloomy picture as higher temperatures lead to species extinctions, famines, the collapse of have-not nations, continent-scale water shortages and the spread of tropical diseases.

    Some aspects of climate change are irreversible -- the burning of fossil fuels since the dawn of the Industrial Age in 1750 has already pushed up carbon dioxide levels in Earth's atmosphere enough to touch off a warming trend that could last a millennium.

    Burton and other scientists and policy analysts interviewed by The Vancouver Sun suggested that all levels of society in Canada, including government, business and individuals, are so enmeshed in the debate about reducing greenhouse gas emissions they may not yet recognize the need to expend an equal effort preparing for global warming effects.

    "Fixing the emission problem won't preclude the need to deal with the warming trend itself, which will continue to build for centuries -- and the favourable impact of any greenhouse gas reductions won't be felt for decades.

    "My message to Canadians, private sector people, municipalities, governments at all levels, is to get the best information you can about climate change and ask yourselves how that affects your business or your operations, and what you can do about that."

    The Working Group Two report will have a chapter on climate impacts in North America and it's expected that British Columbia will get at least a mention.

    "This report is attempting to translate the results of climate science research into impacts, environmental damage, economic damage, the implications for society and implications for our abilities to adapt," said Environment Canada researcher Stewart Cohen, a past and present contributor to the IPCC reports.

    "We as a society are changing fundamentally our relationship to climate," he said in a telephone interview from his office at the University of B.C., where is he an adjunct professor.

    For example, Cohen says our present systems, laws and regulations for managing water, food, fish and forests, and engineering roads, bridges and pipelines are all based on the assumption of "a constant climate."

    Change the climate, and we have to scramble to change the system we rely on to allocate water rights, or agricultural quotas.

    Our cities might need a civil emergency plan to protect tens of thousands of sick and elderly residents in the event of a prolonged summer heat wave.

    In a semi-desert climate like the Okanagan, we invite chaos if we don't have a water management plan that sets priorities for obtaining water among residents, local governments, orchard operators, vintners, farmers, tourism operators, firefighters, and fish, he says.

    Cohen and colleagues have just finished a new report on water supply management for the Okanagan region that addresses many of those conflicts.

    He's optimistic that it can serve as a template for other regions, but at this point there are more questions than answers about managing vital resources under the added pressure of global warming.

    Cohen says B.C. needs to initiate what he calls "a parallel debate" alongside greenhouse gas reductions and increase our "capacity to adapt."

    "We are a wealthy region, we've got highly educated people running all these systems and running our governments. That would automatically suggest we already have a high capacity to adapt.

    "And yet we are still faced with these important local climate impacts -- the destruction of forests by the mountain pine beetle, dealing with fluctuations in the fisheries, potential concerns about sea level rise or reductions in glaciers, changes in fire risk, or what to do if new diseases start to appear from other parts of the world."

    As evidenced by the advance of the mountain pine beetle across British Columbia's Interior pine forests, those changes are already happening.

    For example, Greater Victoria is facing severe summer water shortages as early as 2015 -- regardless of recent efforts to increase local reservoir capacity.

    In addition, rising sea levels present as great a threat to the Queen Charlotte Islands, or Haida Gwaii, as anywhere along Canada's 243,000-kilometre coastline.

    Meanwhile, it seems that glaciers are moving faster than governments in response to global warming.

    Ian Walker, a geographer at the University of Victoria, said he is "flabbergasted" by the rapid loss of shoreline along Graham Island's East Beach on Haida Gwaii, one of Canada's most vulnerable landscapes, in the face of increasingly violent Pacific storms and a rising sea level.

    At places along the beach, the adjacent Yellowhead Highway is a single step -- just one big wave -- away from crumbling into the Pacific tide.

    Nearby, the perimeter fence along the runway at Masset airport is collapsing into an adjacent beach that is being eroded at the rate of one to three metres per year.

    Walker and Vaughn Barrie of the Geological Survey of Canada have a grant from Natural Resources Canada to study the area, which has been identified as being in the top three per cent of Canada's shoreline for susceptibility to a rising sea level.

    Walker and Barrie have determined that East Beach is spot-on the expected global rate of sea level rise -- 1.6 millimetres per year, or 16 centimetres by 2100.

    But that's a major problem along a gently sloping waterfront where a rise of just two centimetres in sea level will push the sea hundreds of metres inland.

    The situation poses a significant threat to the Graham Island's delicate ecosystems and its 6,000 residents, to roads, ferries and air travellers. "Imagine watching, year after year, one to three metres of your property disappearing. People are, in Haida Gwaii."

    And that's only half the threat to that remote and spectacular landscape.

    The increased violence and frequency of storms charging in from the North Pacific effectively doubles the rate of sea level rise to 3.2 millimetres a year.

    Yet, Walker notes, a land use management plan that has been under negotiation for nine years between the provincial government and the Haida Nation fails to take into account the emerging threats from climate change.

    "In other words, coastal setbacks, emergency plans, are not even on the table," Walker said in a telephone interview.

    "That same situation exists across the province. I can't think of one land resource management plan that considers climate change or extreme events."

    The lack of preparedness reaches right across Canada, he adds.

    "In some areas of Canada, especially our coastlines, we don't have good maps. It seems silly to say that but we don't have decent maps that allow us, for instance, to consider where sea level will sit.

    "We need baseline information and some monitoring as well, otherwise we don't know what we're trying to adapt to, or how to do it."

    Walker is one of the lead authors for B.C. in the upcoming federal report on global warming impacts and adaptations for Canada.

    The B.C. section explores problems including elevated impacts from floods, droughts, economic threats, water management conflicts, and the threat to agriculture.

    Demand for water in urban areas is a "major issue", because both Greater Vancouver and Greater Victoria are drought-prone in summer, Walker said.

    "In Victoria we are going to have difficulty -- even though we just expanded our reservoir system -- meeting demand by 2015.

    "That's not very far away, is it? If population and development trends continue as they are, we are going to be in serious trouble."

    Another issue is the demands an increasing number of "extreme" weather events will have on civic infrastructure -- including low-lying communities, coastal highways, airports, ferries, ports, electricity generation and delivery.

    "Look at the storms we had this year," Walker said. "Events such as wind storms, forest fires, storm surges, erosion and landslides, snowstorms, droughts, floods, everything -- you have to adapt your entire infrastructure.

    "You need a bigger civil infrastructure, changes to building codes for all manner of structures. Things like the amount of freeboard on bridges, coastal setbacks. They just haven't been considered in light of climate change, and that's a real problem."

    University of Toronto political scientist and author Thomas Homer-Dixon, an internationally-sought commentator on threats to global security, said he defers to Burton on the question of adaptation.

    But Homer-Dixon, a Victoria native who has studied climate change since the late 1980s when he was finishing his doctorate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, agrees that the IPCC Working Group One report is "about a year out of date."

    In fact, he says, the format of the IPCC itself -- an international body that issues global climate change reports and recommendations every five or six years -- should be reconsidered.

    "I think the consensus now is that they need to change the IPCC as an institution and, in a sense, provide much more realtime updates on things," Homer-Dixon said.

    He said one of the greatest threats is that the climate as it changes will make "sudden jumps" rather than an orderly transition, as a vast array of regional and global weather systems attempt to rebalance themselves in a warming climate.

    "You can have long periods of time with relatively low change, then a sudden shift as, say, energy transfer patterns within the climate system reorganize themselves."

    He adds that our civic infrastructure, our food production systems, and our economies "really aren't designed to adapt well to that kind of variation."

    "There is a real risk of some very nasty things happening in the future and I don't think people should downplay those risks, especially as some kind of non-linear change appears [and] the climate flips. The costs could be astronomical.

    "We are going to have to build coastal barriers, move infrastructure and perhaps habitation away from coastal areas, pump water long distances to places that become dry, drill deeper for water, desalinize water in some areas -- and this is all true at the very time when it's likely that energy is going to become much more expensive."

    Homer-Dixon believes Canadians could cut energy consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions, 20 to 30 per cent with minimal impact on our standard of living.

    He said developing renewable energy sources for electricity could cut emissions by a similar amount. "Between those two we are talking about 60 per cent, right off the top. That's huge. That's a big difference."

    But he's deeply concerned there may be no simple fix for the biggest problem -- the expansion of coal-fired electricity generation plants.

    North America relies primarily on cheap, accessible coal to generate more than half its electricity, and China is adding a new coal generation plant about once every two weeks.

    Those plants are emerging as the biggest threat to greenhouse gas reduction targets because there are no substitutes on the grand scale that's needed.

    So far, the suggested solution is to capture the emissions and pipe them away to underground storage caverns -- including retired oil and natural gas wells.

    "I've been writing on carbon sequestration and I've been receiving notes from people who are really quite knowledgeable, saying this technology may well not work. The stuff may leak," Dixon said.

    "Technologically, we have a relatively small needlehole to thread here. We don't have a lot of options. We have to make sure sequestration works."

    We will, he adds, need something other than technology to carry society through the rough patches ahead. "We are going to have to be a bit lucky. We are going to have to hope that nature is, to a certain extent, on our side."

    ssimpson@png.canwest.com

    You can now listen to every Vancouver Sun story on our new digital edition.

    Free to full-week print subscribers or register for a seven-day free trial.

    www.vancouversun.com/

    The Gazette (Montreal) 2007

     

    http://groups.msn.com/Moncton101
    http://moncton101.spaces.live.com

    crime beat, police beat, Moncton, greater Moncton, Moncton101, atlantic Canada, Halifax, Fredericton, Saint John, Dartmouth   

                                     
    Buy, sell, trade, Give away & Looking for,Yard & Garage Sales, Coupon Exchange, Local Events, 4 & 2 Rent, People Locater, F.Y.I., Crime Beat, Promote your abilities, And much more.


    Keeping you informed, entertained, amused.. and Spam Free

    Buy, Sell, or Trade on Moncton.net.

    Moncton's Free Classifieds
    http://www.moncton.net/classifieds/

    "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
    - Albert Einstein -

  •  04-01-2007, 9:19 AM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    2 things about this stupid stuff

    1   Quebec should have been stop by the federal givernment   that bills should have been revoked



    2 in the constitution  it said French and English   no other language was mentioned

    stupidity governs the world
  •  04-01-2007, 9:02 PM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    notme wrote:
    2 things about this stupid stuff

    1   Quebec should have been stop by the federal givernment   that bills should have been revoked



    2 in the constitution  it said French and English   no other language was mentioned

    i recall from our previous clashes you are a pro-bilingualism person. So if that's the case, Nunavut should be encouraged to pursue their policies (what makes QC and NB any different?)

    PS personally i think POVERTY and DESTITUTION is the driving force behind any billingual policies. But thats not a good way to solve those problems. In fact, the long-term result is complete opposite of the desired one.


    "Every dog is a lion at home" - Italian proverb
    ---



    50 Years of Space Age
  •  04-01-2007, 9:04 PM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    oh, yeah, I want to make it clear, genuine desire to speak your own language is a good thing.

    But we all know thats not what is actually going on...


    "Every dog is a lion at home" - Italian proverb
    ---



    50 Years of Space Age
  •  04-02-2007, 6:57 AM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    Student wrote:

    notme wrote:
    2 things about this stupid stuff

    1   Quebec should have been stop by the federal givernment   that bills should have been revoked



    2 in the constitution  it said French and English   no other language was mentioned

    i recall from our previous clashes you are a pro-bilingualism person. So if that's the case, Nunavut should be encouraged to pursue their policies (what makes QC and NB any different?)

    PS personally i think POVERTY and DESTITUTION is the driving force behind any billingual policies. But thats not a good way to solve those problems. In fact, the long-term result is complete opposite of the desired one.



    nb and quebec are not different they are just applying the federal law  into a provincial      because we have the right to be served in both official language   all over Canada it the law

    stupidity governs the world
  •  04-02-2007, 7:10 AM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    Notme:  Being served doesn't make it useful. I think that is what many French speakers in Moncton do not quite understand. What the hell if fair? The last time I checked the dictionary, nowhere in there did it say fair meant "to pay debt" or "make good" or "official". I think its a lot of crap, that no matter what, the French will also pay in the end for this stupidity. Watch and see and take notes. Sorry but its true. You may feel its victory now over the English but you will see.
    Together we stand, Divided we fall.
  •  04-02-2007, 7:16 AM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    actually i do not feel victory over the English because to me we have no English nor French nor whatever other race it is   we are all CANADIANS   and weshould follow ALL THE SAME RULES   and it BEING a BILINGUAL COUNTRY   FRENCH andENGLISH  orif you prefer ENGLISH and FRENCH

    stupidity governs the world
  •  04-02-2007, 9:30 PM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    just because British Queen is the head of the state in Canada, doesnt mean we have to create a munument for her on every corner of every street

    If we blindly follow the Language Act, then people in Yorkton, SK with almost no French population should have all their public services in each "official" language.

    Language Act was the way to keep Quebec "in". Now French communities accross the country are abusing the Act in order to secure jobs. And Government is simply numbed by the situation that THEY created (and thus it would be stupid to blame the French).

    Hey, listen, kudos to the French. They found the loop hole in the law and they use it to its fullest extent. Lets put it this way, if I had my way, I would have done the same.


    "Every dog is a lion at home" - Italian proverb
    ---



    50 Years of Space Age
  •  04-03-2007, 7:30 AM

    Re: Nunavut takes a page from Language Bill 101

    we are allowed the language by law and that is the point an the only point   we are a country with 2 outstanding cultures   and it was decided that these cultures should live together  but with one thing in commun which some people for some stupid reason do not want to do it    is veing : bilingual  French and English  that is what makes us a great country    ,that is what makes a CANADIAN .......not an English or French Canadfian they do not exist   ......  we are all CANADIANS  and we are suppose to be BILINGUAL

    stupidity governs the world

 

 

 

 

 

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems