Moncton Forum

Anything goes on the Greater Moncton Forum!
Welcome to Moncton Forum Sign in or Join | Help
Forums Active Topics Who Is Online? Hall of Fame Forum Rules Chat!

Canada and the War of Radical Islamic Terror

Last post 04-03-2008, 9:09 PM by Paladin. 26 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (27 items)   1 2 Next >
Related on YouTube Sort Posts:
  •  11-11-2006, 7:23 AM

    Canada and the War of Radical Islamic Terror

    Lest We Forget

    Canada,less five years behind Britain in its domestic terrorism problem.

    Globe and Mail

    2006/11/11

    Britain's top spymaster raised eyebrows in Canada and around the world by painting an alarming picture of the threat from home-grown terrorism, saying her agency is tracking at least 1,600 terrorists, involved in as many as 30 plots meant to “to kill people and to damage our economy.”

    “It is not just the U.K. of course,” said Dame Eliza Manningham Buller, director-general of the British Security Service, or MI5. “Other countries also face a new terrorist threat, from Spain to France to Canada and Germany.”

    Agencies and academics in Canada were taken aback by the tone and the candour of the spymaster's comments.

    “The director-general rarely, capital R-A-R-E-L-Y, speaks publicly,” said Martin Rudner, a counterterrorism expert at Carleton University in Ottawa. “The fact that she spoke and spoke to empirical data, is to be taken very, very seriously. This is not chit-chat.”


     Another Canadian security source, who asked not to be identified, described Dame Eliza's remarks as exceptionally rare, and said they reflect the gravity of the “terrible situation” in Britain.

    The 30 plots cited by Dame Eliza refer only to the most serious and most advanced threats.

    The source said that there are some key differences between Canada and Britain. For instance, many British Muslims are of Pakistani origin, while Canadian Muslims have far more diverse backgrounds; and Britain's radical groups are considered both more radical and more established. That renders the situation in this country less dire, the source said, but the pronouncements are nonetheless alarming.

    Indeed, at the two security agencies — and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the British service have a close working relationship — the conventional wisdom is that Canada is probably no more than five years behind Britain in terms of its domestic terrorism problem.

    Canadian and British officials believe that many other European countries — including France, Italy and Germany — have comparably radicalized Muslim populations posing threats as dangerous as those in Britain, but that the British Security Service has a better grasp of its problem than the agencies in those countries. As well, they say, the British people have come to grips with the issue in a way that other populations have not.

    CSIS is known to have been tracking 274 terrorism suspects last year, a number proportionally far lower than Britain.

    While CSIS doesn't say how many active plots it might be tracking, 19 suspects are facing trial in two Canadian terrorism cases. Significantly, the lead suspects in both of these groups stand accused of hatching plans with people in Britain, a country where 99 suspects face terrorism charges in more than 30 distinct cases, according to Dame Eliza.

    In national security circles, conventional wisdom has been that Canada's immigration policies and its history as a non-imperial middle power have insulated it somewhat from a threat level as high as Britain's. But new innovations — such as the use of the Internet by al-Qaeda-inspired groups to radicalize youth — are at work everywhere.

    “The use of the Internet has assumed enormous importance,” CSIS director Jim Judd told a conference last month “It has in some respects been transformed into a terrorist university, obviating the past need for travel to a conflict zone for ‘on-the-job training.'”

    In fact, both Mr. Judd and Dame Eliza point out in their most recent speeches that terrorists in Iraq upload and distribute bombing videos within minutes of attacks.

    Fears of “homegrown” terrorism have prompted Western security agencies to redouble efforts to reach out to Muslim community leaders.

    Ahmad Shehab, a fundamentalist imam in Toronto, says some of these meetings have served to build goodwill. “Let me make it clear: We do proclaim the good name of Canada, and we stand firm against any individual or groups that could hurt the security of Canada,” he says in a speech being broadcast on the Internet.

    At Queen Mary's College in London this week, MI5's Dame Eliza told her audience that her staff of 2,800 are being run off their collective feet.

    British agencies, she said, have disrupted five major plots and saved “hundreds, possibly even thousands of lives” since subway bombings killed 50 Britons in July of 2005.

    Yet the next attack could be right around the corner. “More and more people are moving from passive sympathy toward active terrorism,” Dame Eliza said. Polls, she added, indicate that “100,000 of our citizens consider that the July, 2005, attacks in London were justified.”

    Earlier this year, a posthumous video of the lead suicide bomber in the subway attacks was released. Mohammed Sidique Khan said the bombings were payback for Britain's role in the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. “Until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people, we will not stop this fight,” he said.

    Some officials say that Canada's multiculturalism, its social mobility and the point system used to select highly skilled immigrants have kept Canada from developing an underclass that might be a fertile breeding ground for extremist tensions. And certain hard-line Muslim leaders say they are indebted to Canada, as they are freer to practise Islam here than they would be in most Middle Eastern countries.

    Yet Canada's decision to send troops to Afghanistan has inflamed some young extremists. The ringleaders of a group of Toronto suspects arrested this past June hatched plans about storming Parliament to demand the withdrawal of soldiers from Afghanistan. In the end, it's alleged, they decided to explode truck bombs against a Toronto CSIS office and an unspecified Canadian Forces base. The plot was thwarted.


    Keeping you informed, entertained and amused..

    Moncton.net archives-http://www.moncton.net/canadian%2Ddiscussions/


    Moncton.net Chat-http://www.moncton.net/e/chat.aspx


    "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
    - Albert Einstein -

  •  11-11-2006, 1:09 PM

    Re: Canada and the War of Radical Islamic Terror

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFaUY1IIYJI--Tribute to the Canadian Soldiers in Afghanistan
  •  11-11-2006, 1:23 PM

    Re: Canada and the War of Radical Islamic Terror

  •  11-11-2006, 1:24 PM

    Re: Canada and the War of Radical Islamic Terror

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xObLzr-hk8I ---

    Canadian force - Shout


  •  11-11-2006, 1:41 PM

    Re: Canada and the War of Radical Islamic Terror

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-ED3nIGnm4 --Dedication to the Soldiers
  •  11-21-2006, 3:10 AM

    Canadian targets on al-Qaeda hit list



    http://groups.msn.com/Moncton101

         

    ezyEdit - ASP Website Portal

                                                                           

    PaladinLogo.jpg

     

    Canadian targets on al-Qaeda hit list, RCMP official says

    OTTAWA -- Al-Qaeda terrorists intend to attack Canada, says the head of the RCMP's national-security branch.

    "I firmly believe it is a question of not if, but when," Assistant Commissioner Mike McDonell said yesterday. "The threat is growing."

    He said the threat is real, though it is impossible to say whether it is imminent.

    "I can't speak to it being imminent. I have no knowledge of that," he said.

     "That's the nature of this threat. . . . There are things we don't know. It lives amongst us."

    Canadian targets -- either at home or abroad -- are particularly attractive because the country has not been hit yet by a terrorist attack, Mr. McDonell told CTV's Question Period.

    "I believe that the fact we have not been hit makes the attack upon Canada a symbolic attack" that would be a highly prized achievement for al-Qaeda terrorists, he said.

    Mr. McDonell noted that Canada alone of the five countries cited as enemies by the al-Qaeda leadership has not yet been attacked by the terrorist group.

    The other four countries mentioned by al-Qaeda were the United States, Britain, Spain and Australia.

    The RCMP have broken up a number of terror plots aimed at Canada or Canadian targets abroad, Mr. McDonell went on to say.

    The Mounties quietly broke up at least a dozen terrorist plots in the past two years, according to documents obtained by The Globe and Mail in June.

    Disruptive tactics -- sometimes as simple as letting targets know that they are under close surveillance -- are used to prevent a terrorist attack when the police do not have enough evidence to lay criminal charges, the Mounties say.

    Mr. McDonell refused to disclose the number of people the Mounties are investigating as terror suspects.

    But he said about 300 members of the force are currently assigned full-time to security cases and are augmented regularly by local police officers.

    However, it is known that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service had 274 individual terror suspects in its sights last year, according to a report last month by a review committee set up by Parliament.

    A total of 31 organizations came under suspicion and were targeted for investigation by the CSIS anti-terrorism branch.

    CSIS director Jim Judd has sounded an optimistic note about the possibility of thwarting terrorist attacks.

    "It is certainly possible . . . we would be successful in averting an attack," he told the Senate committee on national security and defence in June.

    Mr. McDonell said that in some ways the fact that Canadian military forces are helping to fight insurgents in Afghanistan has actually increased the threat of a terrorist attack on Canadian targets at home.

    He noted that websites used to incite terrorist operations are mentioning Canada more frequently because of the Canadian military involvement in Afghanistan.

    "At the same time, I am a firm believer that our actions speak to the root of the problem," by denying al-Qaeda any safe haven in Afghanistan, where the terrorist group can train and plan for new attacks.

    The Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington were planned by al-Qaeda head Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan. The aircraft hijackers in those attacks trained in that country when it was ruled by the Taliban, the U.S., Canada and other Western governments say.

     

     

     

     

    http://groups.msn.com/Moncton101
    http://groups.msn.com/MonctonsSingleAdults http://groups.msn.com/NBsingles
    http://groups.msn.com/LifelineGreaterMoncton 

    crime beat, police beat, Moncton, greater Moncton, Moncton101, atlantic Canada, Halifax, Fredericton, Saint John, Dartmouth   

                                     
    Buy, sell, trade, Give away & Looking for,Yard & Garage Sales, Coupon Exchange, Local Events, 4 & 2 Rent, People Locater, F.Y.I., Crime Beat, Promote your abilities, And much more.


    Keeping you informed, entertained and amused..

    Moncton.net archives-http://www.moncton.net/canadian%2Ddiscussions/


    Moncton.net Chat-http://www.moncton.net/e/chat.aspx


    "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
    - Albert Einstein -

  •  11-21-2006, 12:11 PM

    Re: Canadian targets on al-Qaeda hit list

    OTTAWA -- Al-Qaeda terrorists intend to attack Canada, says the head of the RCMP's national-security branch...

     

    i can see it happening since we are no longer peacekeepers but full fledges killer in unjustified wars


    i hate rats

    tit for tat
  •  12-13-2006, 4:32 AM

    Involvement in Palestinian terrorist group a form of "freedom of expression" ?

    http://groups.msn.com/Moncton101

         

    ezyEdit - ASP Website Portal

     

                                                                          

    PaladinLogo.jpg

     

    Belonging to terror group not a right: judge

     

    National Post


    Tuesday, December 12, 2006


    TORONTO - A Beirut-born man who argued he should not be deported because his involvement in a Palestinian terrorist group was a form of "freedom of expression" has lost his bid to remain in Canada.

    The Federal Court ruled against Issam Al Yamani, a volunteer at a Palestinian non-profit organization in Mississauga and the alleged former Canadian head of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).

    Mr. Al Yamani, 50, had argued that his activities for the PFLP terror group were protected by sections of the Charter of Rights that guarantee freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression.

    But the judge ruled that Mr. Al Yamani's complaint was "without merit" since "his right to belong to a terrorist organization does not fall within the rights protected by Section 15" of the Charter.

    The Canada Border Services Agency said the decision "brings us one step closer" to deporting Mr. Al Yamani. "Individuals that commit crimes against humanity, war crimes, acts of terrorism or pose a threat to Canadian society are not welcome here," spokeswoman Anna Pape said yesterday.

    Canada outlawed the PFLP in 2003, describing it as a Marxist terrorist organization that since 1968 had committed hijackings, car bombings and suicide bombings. The PFLP's bombing of an Israeli pizzeria in February, 2002, killed three civilians.

    Mr. Al Yamani volunteers at Palestine House, which describes itself as "an educational, social and cultural centre to the Palestinian community" in Canada.

    Reached at its Mississauga offices yesterday, Mr. Al Yamani said he was unaware the court had released its decision. Asked if he would leave Canada now, he said: "I have to consult with my lawyer on that issue."

    Born in Lebanon to Palestinian parents, Mr. Al Yamani immigrated to Canada in 1985 but he was soon the target of a Canadian Security Intelligence Service counter-terrorism investigation. Federal authorities took the first steps toward deporting him in 1992.

    Although he insists he was never involved in the "military wing" of any Palestinian group, CSIS alleged in court documents that "in Lebanon in 1977 Mr. Al Yamani received training in the construction of bombs" and "training in the use of the Kalashnikov rifle."

    The intelligence service added that "there was a 1977 bombing incident in the United Arab Emirates and Mr. Al Yamani was involved in that incident."

    The incident in question was the bombing of an Air Egypt office. He has never been charged with any crime in Canada or elsewhere.

    In Canada, he was the alleged "Canadian Head" of the PFLP and served as a documents courier and "financial operator" who directed money to the accounts of known PFLP personalities, according to CSIS. "Mr. Al Yamani has been involved in recruiting members of the PFLP and in establishing PFLP cells or rings in Canada," CSIS alleged.

    The father of two, however, has so far successfully fought Canada's deportation efforts through the courts. His latest appeal had sought to overturn a ruling by the Immigration Refugee Board that concluded he was inadmissible to Canada because he had been a member of a terror group. The Federal Court upheld the IRB's decision on Dec. 1.

    Mr. Al Yamani said yesterday that if Canada insists on deporting him he would ask to go to the town in Israel where his parents had lived. He said he had a "right of return" based on a United Nations resolution.

    He said it was wrong to label groups like the PFLP terrorist outfits, comparing them to political parties in Canada. Since Palestinians lack a formal government, they join factions involved in fighting Israel, he said.

    "All Palestinian people who want to participate in the just struggle of the Palestinian people have to be affiliated or associated with the political party available to them, like any Canadians who are affiliated with the Liberal party, Bloc Quebecois, Conservatives, Greens, NDP."

     

     

    http://groups.msn.com/Moncton101
    http://groups.msn.com/MonctonsSingleAdults http://groups.msn.com/NBsingles
    http://groups.msn.com/LifelineGreaterMoncton 

    crime beat, police beat, Moncton, greater Moncton, Moncton101, atlantic Canada, Halifax, Fredericton, Saint John, Dartmouth   

                                     
    Buy, sell, trade, Give away & Looking for,Yard & Garage Sales, Coupon Exchange, Local Events, 4 & 2 Rent, People Locater, F.Y.I., Crime Beat, Promote your abilities, And much more.


    Keeping you informed, entertained and amused..

    Moncton.net archives-http://www.moncton.net/canadian%2Ddiscussions/


    Moncton.net Chat-http://www.moncton.net/e/chat.aspx


    "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
    - Albert Einstein -

  •  02-15-2007, 4:29 PM

    al-Qaeda threatens to attack Alberta’s petroleum infrastructure

         

    ezyEdit - ASP Website Portal

                                                                          

    PaladinLogo.jpg

     

    Alberta terror threat downplayed

    SUN MEDIA


    Provincial officials say they’re taking seriously an al-Qaeda threat to attack Alberta’s petroleum infrastructure but have not raised any threat level.

    A spokesman for the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (EUB) said today they were alerted last week of statements on an Arabian-peninsula-based terrorist website encouraging attacks on oil installations in Canada, Mexico and Venezuela to disrupt the U.S. economy.

    Premier Ed Stelmach said he learned of the e-posting on Tuesday but added security agencies already had the issue well in hand.

    And he downplayed the magnitude of the threat.

    “It’s not one that has alarmed anybody in terms of a serious threat...there will be threats ongoing especially with what’s going on in the Middle East,” he said.

    ‘I feel very secure and so should all Albertans.”

    Nonetheless, Stelmach urged Albertans to keep a close eye out for any suspicious activity.


    “If something’s happening in their community that seems odd, please report it to the local police,” said the premier.

    EUB spokesman Darin Barter echoed Stelmach’s call forvigilance but said no moves have been made to increase the threat level or alter long-standing security plans.

    “It’s more of a heightened awareness and alert — it’s a heightened sensitivity to what’s going on,” he said.

    Barter said security authorities are convinced the website statements are from genuine terrorists.

    “We’re taking it as a threat made against Alberta.”

    A thorough security strategy for the oilpatch has been in place since the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, with companies playing a key role in the plan.

    If pipelines are attacked and damaged, remote sensors will shut down the flow, said Barter.

    What’s dubbed critical infrastructure, such as refineries and other structures, he said, are protected by police, intelligence and company security.

    “They’re very well protected — the intelligence agency we have allows us to be very pro-active,” said Barter.

    A year ago, an unsuccessful assault was launched against the world’s largest oil processing facility at Abqaiq, Saudi Arabia.

    A statement on the al-Qaida Voice of Holy War e-magazine said “it is necessary to hit oil interests in all regions which serve the United States, not just in the Middle East.”

    It also referred to the Abqaiq attack.

    http://groups.msn.com/Moncton101
    http://moncton101.spaces.live.com
    http://groups.msn.com/MonctonsSingleAdults
    http://groups.msn.com/NBsingles
    http://groups.msn.com/LifelineGreaterMoncton 

    crime beat, police beat, Moncton, greater Moncton, Moncton101, atlantic Canada, Halifax, Fredericton, Saint John, Dartmouth   

                                     
    Buy, sell, trade, Give away & Looking for,Yard & Garage Sales, Coupon Exchange, Local Events, 4 & 2 Rent, People Locater, F.Y.I., Crime Beat, Promote your abilities, And much more.


    Keeping you informed, entertained and amused..

    Moncton.net archives-http://www.moncton.net/canadian%2Ddiscussions/


    Moncton.net Chat-http://www.moncton.net/e/chat.aspx


    "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
    - Albert Einstein -

  •  02-15-2007, 4:43 PM

    Re: al-Qaeda threatens to attack Alberta’s petroleum infrastructure

     one way out of the threat  is not to sell our oil and keep it for us maybe that way our prices would be lower    ...we would not have to substazed   to export oil  to the US

    i hate rats

    tit for tat
  •  02-19-2007, 11:43 PM

    Wakeup Canada-Understand the mind of the Jihadist

    Wakeup Canada

    Understand the mind of the Jihadist

    By David J. Jonsson


    The war on terror might be lost not on the streets of Baghdad but in the corridors of the House of Commons. A divided Free World and Anti-Americanism serves our enemies well. It is time for Canada to understand who the enemy is, the murderous ideology that is driving them and their strategy for success. This would be the Islamist's greatest fear.

    It is important to understand that the goal of the Jihadists is -- following in the footsteps of Muhammad to create the "Islamic kingdom of God on Earth." The primary goal is not primarily to conquer lands but to Islamize the world. The drive is to instill Islamic law (Shariah) into both Muslim society and the entire world, and ultimately to recreate society under their interpretation of the law. The strategy is to utilize the sword of Islam. The sword may include terrorism, but more importantly it is bringing together groups of people with a common hatred, which can cause the ultimate decline in will of the populous. This cabal has coalesced as the Leftist/Marxist -- Islamist Alliance. As we will see pacifism, self-hatred, complacency and appeasement -- deserve attention, equally important is the use of Islamic Finance to gradually make the West comfortable with accepting living with Shariah law. See my article: Islamic Economics and Shariah Law: A Plan for World Domination.

    In the forward to Militant Ideology Atlas recently published by the Counter Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy General (retired) Wayne A. Downing commented: "President Bush, in his commencement address at West Point in May 2006, compared our nation's current war with violent Islamic extremism to the long struggle against communism and the Soviet Union. The President told graduating cadets from the Class of 2006‚--nearly all bound for combat in Iraq and Afghanistan‚--that, "like the Cold War, we are fighting the followers of a murderous ideology that despises freedom, crushes all dissent, has territorial ambitions, and pursues totalitarian aims." The United States and her allies eventually prevailed in the long war against the Soviets but only after making a concerted effort to fully understand the enemy, its ideology, its vulnerabilities, and how these vulnerabilities could be best exploited. Today, over five years into this generation's long war, we do not have this same understanding of the ideology that is driving our enemies; we lack a map needed for planning the way ahead. "Significantly, the report uses these empirical findings to identify powerful messages and influential messengers that can turn different constituencies against the Jihadis. These constituencies range from benign mainstream Muslims to the most violent Jihadis. The recommendations of this report establish a baseline against which strategic communications campaigns can be calibrated and adjusted.

    An old adage warns,

    "If you don't know where you are going, you'll probably end up somewhere else."

    According to Chris Heffelfinger writing in the Terrorism Monitor Volume 4, Issue 24, December 14, 2006 The Ideological Voices of the Jihadi Movement, "It is news to few observers that thousands, even millions, of young Muslims are influenced‚--to some extent‚--by jihadi literature circulating on various Islamist websites and discussion forums. The mujahideen's use of the Internet for communication, indoctrination, recruitment and public relations has been well demonstrated. Through this medium, a field of preachers and ideologues compete for the vast audience of young Muslims, attempting to sway their opinion and bring them to the "correct" practice and understanding of Islam. Those backing the global jihadi movement have succeeded in capturing this audience‚--perhaps more so than other contenders‚--and have gained a wide following of careful but loyal readers."

    "Surprisingly, the study found that al-Qaeda leaders Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are not highly cited in jihadi literature. They are not considered authorities in Islamic law or looked to as the ideological force behind the jihadi movement. Indeed, in the world of Salafi-Jihadi ideology, they are relatively minor players. One possible reason for this is that the two are figureheads, pioneers in carrying out successful attacks against one of the enemies of Muslims. This suggests that there is a role for charismatic leaders to bring Muslims to jihad, as soldiers to the battlefield, but there is a separate role for these Salafi scholars in setting the broader goals for the movement, the limits and terms of engagement and selecting valid and legal targets. They are, in essence, creating the Islamic legal framework for this struggle so that the basis upon which it is waged will be sound. It is then left to strategists and Mujahid leaders to conduct successful campaigns within this framework."

    "For the most influential scholars of the Salafi movement, are such as Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi, Abu Qatada [See: Extremist clerics face prosecution for backing terror from Times On Line July 14, 2005. Abu Qatada: "Rome is a cross. The West is a cross and Romans are the owners of the cross. Muslims' target is the West. We will split Rome open. The destruction must be carried out by sword. Those who will destroy Rome are already preparing the swords. Rome will not be conquered with the word but with the force of arms"] and Abu Basir al-Tartusi (Abd-al-Munim Mustafa Abu-Halimah) [See: Islamic Legitimacy for the London Bombings Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies (C.S.S)]. The end goal is never jihad itself. [See also The Book Entitled: '39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad] The objective is to bring Muslims to a Salafi reading of Islam and then to deliver salvation to the global Muslim community. As such, the primary element of the literature is the meaning and implementation of the Shariah. The scholars first bring their interpretation of Islamic law on various political and social issues and present their advice on the appropriate action. The common ground among the scholars behind the jihadi movement is their rejection of Muslims living under apostate laws and political systems governing outside what God has decreed. The required response‚--for all, but to differing degrees and with differing tactics‚--is resistance."


    "This drive to instill Islamic law into Muslim society, and ultimately recreate that society under their interpretation of the law, often translates into an endorsement for violent jihad as practiced by bin Laden and others. While there are many Muslim scholars who call for these sources of law to be the primary factors in how Muslims live, the important distinction lies in how one should confront political systems that rule by law other than Shariah. The debate over law and society is critical in jihadi literature. It establishes the framework through which young Muslims should struggle; for these scholars, it is clear their aim is not jihad, but the creation of such a society through jihad, an obligatory struggle for the believer."

    "These Salafi scholars play a critical but not widely observed role in the global jihadi movement. Ideology is often overlooked and is considered separate from the strategic and operational aspects of Islamist militancy. Yet, the scholars behind the jihadi movement set the framework for debates and provide direction that is by and large adhered to, or is at the least a determining factor in the planning of attacks. By better understanding their role in the movement, governments combating terrorism can attempt to intervene earlier in the radicalization process and ultimately work toward undermining their influence."

    According to the article in MERI Special Dispatch Series - No. 1007 October 17, 2005: Saudi Columnist: Jihadist Salafist Ideology is Like Nazism, "Saudi columnist Muhammad bin 'Abd Al-Latif Aal Al-Sheikh published two articles in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, in which he attacked the ideology of the Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya movement. He said that the ideology of this movement was similar to, or even worse than, the Nazi ideology, and that it should be dealt accordingly. "Therefore, I still believe that one of the primary missions of the international community today is to repeat its experience with Nazism and to deal with this dangerous barbarian culture exactly as it dealt with the Nazi culture. If this does not happen, the near future is liable to bring many [events], the consequences of which will be far more severe for all of humanity than [the consequences] of World War II."


    "Whether it realizes this or not, the West is facing a kind of liberal-Islamic alliance: a sympathetic relationship that leading leftists  have with Islamic radicals around the world. I'm not suggesting the two groups actually like each other. Actually, they despise each other. Leftists like Pelosi, Barney Frank and Michael Moore despise bin Laden and his fellow radicals because they are religious fundamentalists who want to impose Islamic [Shariah] holy law. That means goodbye to women's rights and gay rights and, in all candor, goodbye to people like Pelosi, Frank and Moore. By the same token, Islamic radicals like bin Laden detest the American left because, as they see it, the left is the party of atheism, family breakdown and cultural depravity. The left is in the vanguard of imposing secularism, no-fault divorce, gay marriage and libertine social values not only in America but also abroad."

    "But the man who threatens the Islamic radicals and the American left even more than either group threatens the other is Bush. Leftists don't like radical Muslims like bin Laden but they absolutely hate Bush. Why? Because from the left's point of view, bin Laden threatens to impose Shariah in Baghdad but Bush threatens to impose Shariah in Boston. Bin Laden is the far enemy but Bush is the near enemy."

    "In the past generation, the left has gone from a party that mainly cares about working people to a party that mainly cares about sex. Labor unions are now a low priority, and abortion and gay rights have become the centerpiece of the left's social agenda. Bin Laden doesn't threaten these rights, but Bush does. One more Supreme Court appointment by Bush, and Roe vs. Wade might be jeopardized. The biggest obstacle to gay marriage today is the president and his allies on the religious right."

    Consequently the left seems to have developed a devious strategy to share the aims of the enemy abroad in order to defeat the enemy at home. Leading leftists have brought together the likes of Kurt Vonnegut, Toni Morrison, Barbara Ehrenreich, Katha Pollit, Jane Fonda, Spike Lee, Oliver Stone, Gordon Moore, Jim Wallis and others to promote the Anti-War, environmentalism/global warming, anti-globalization, and social justice agendas into a powerful force. I refer to this cabal as the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance in my recent book: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance.


    Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya is a term used by Islamist terror groups to describe themselves as continuing in the footsteps of the early believers of the Prophet Muhammad's generation, and as believing in the duty to wage a modern Jihad war against infidels.

    Al-Jazirah (Saudi Arabia), July 24, 2005.

    David J. Jonsson is the author of Clash of Ideologies —The Making of the Christian and Islamic Worlds, Xulon Press 2005. His new book: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance (Salem Communications (May 30, 2006). He received his undergraduate and graduate degrees in physics. He worked for major corporations in the United States and Japan and with multilateral agencies that brought him to more that fifteen countries with significant or majority populations who are Muslim. These exposures provided insight into the basic tenants of Islam as a political, economic and religious system. He became proficient in Islamic law (Shariah) through contract negotiation and personal encounter.

     

    118


    Keeping you informed, entertained and amused..

    Moncton.net archives-http://www.moncton.net/canadian%2Ddiscussions/


    Moncton.net Chat-http://www.moncton.net/e/chat.aspx


    "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
    - Albert Einstein -

  •  02-19-2007, 11:49 PM

    A Plan for World Domination

         

    ezyEdit - ASP Website Portal

                                                                          

    PaladinLogo.jpg

     

     


     




    Islamic Economics and Shariah Law: A Plan for World Domination

    David J. Jonsson

    December 21, 2006

     

     

     

    My goal today is to put you into the mind of an Islamist—to think like an Islamist. It is only possible to understand the events occurring by understanding their thinking and what it would mean to live under Shariah law. There is a well-worn cliché “It’s the economy stupid” that appears around election times. So it is with Islamic Economics and the Clash of Ideologies we are witnessing today. See also: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance

    It should be realized that the goal of the Islamists, following in the footsteps of Muhammad, is not so much to conquer the land but to Islmanize the populations. In so doing they seek to have the lands come under Shariah law and that the lands become dar al-Islam—the land of Islam and that all non-Muslims accept the status of Dhimmis—subservient to Muslim rule. The Plan involves the incremental acceptance of basic tenants of Shariah law as applied to all aspects of life—the Islamic “Way of Life”. This implies the desire to incrementally change the laws and ultimately the Constitution of the U.S. This requires the population to accept the new laws as equally valid and acceptable. Initially this will result in parallel legal systems and progressing from there with laws that may be applied locally and ultimately nationally. Jihad can be with the pen and the tongue, just as it can be the sword and the spear as Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawi the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood has said. Knowledge combined with economic control can be wielded with the precision of a sharp sword to effect any desired social/political change necessary for the fulfillment of Islam’s goal.


    What is the vision of the Islamists?

    To me based on reading the Qur’an, listening to pronouncements of the leaders, the scholars and reading their writings, it is to establish the “Islamic kingdom of God on earth.”

    If this is true, then we have to look at what actions or events need to occur for the vision to come to pass. It is pretty easy to see what needs to be done and the current status. Then you need to identify the skills needed to complete the task. Then you identify the players for execution and figure out the cost to get them on board. If you read the newspapers and watch the TV, you will notice that the process is underway.

    The Plan involves the incremental acceptance of basic tenants of Shariah law as applied to all aspects of life—the Islamic “Way of Life”.


    There is no question that many Muslims whether they are Summi or Shiite decry terrorism and are loyal Canadians; however, most Muslims subscribe to the Muslim total “way of life” and desire to have the whole world under Islamic rule and the will of Allah. Combining a “way of life” into an economic system is proving to be more powerful than any other in having a global impact and spreading Islam on a global basis.

    Jihad is considered a required religious duty for Muslims. Jihad is Islam’s normal path to expansion.

    Islamic Economics is the stealth sword of Islam. It is more powerful than the Weapons of Mass Destruction and terrorism. It is immune to negotiation. The stealth sword is being applied for the Islamization of the West and the whole world. The goal is to create the “Islamic kingdom of God on earth.” The implementation of Shariah law would have a dramatic affect on your life and that of the entire Western Civilization. Understand the nature of the evil and do not be blindsided.

    The strategy from the time of Muhammad fourteen centuries ago was to create the “Islamic kingdom of God on earth”; this remains throughout the Islamic world today. Islam is not just another religion, but a total “way of life” that brings religion into the economic and political sphere. Integrating Shariah (Islamic law) into economics and finance is a powerful tool for Islamization and ultimately world domination.

    Islamists do not seek integration and assimilation into Western society and culture; they seek to destroy Western governments and to establish nations under Shariah, in which all are subservient to Muslim rule. They seek “justice,” not democracy, as the West knows it--government by the people and for the people. Justice to Islamists means all peoples under Islamic rule.

    Islamic economics has an impact on your life, whether you are a banker, investing in the stock market, selling a home, buying a car, purchasing food, buying a suit or a dress, or just trying to make sense of the current events. Islamic economics and Islamic banking are primary Islamist strategies to condition the West to accept Shariah law as a basis for all life in all nations.

    The Islamic movement is an idea movement; at the present time the leader(s) has not been identified. Many, if not most, of the participants in Islamic Financing may not even be aware that they may be supporting the Islamist agenda.


    The Role of the Muslim Brotherhood


    The Muslim Brotherhood (al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun) was the main motivator behind setting up experiments in Islamic financing on a nationally and internationally workable scale. The theory and practical requirements needed to set up an Islamic banking system came from among the ranks of the Ikhwan.

    "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope."—Muslim Brotherhood


    This then directly links with Ahmadinejad’s beliefs and preaching about the return of 12th  Imam.

    In his book, Islamic Way of Life, Mawdudi wrote: “The chief characteristic of the Islamic Concept of Life is that it does not admit a conflict, nay, not even a significant separation between life-spiritual and life-mundane. It does not confine itself merely in purifying the spiritual and the moral life of man in the limited sense of the word. Its domain extends to the entire gamut of life. It wants to mould individual life as well as the social order in healthy patterns, so that the Islamic kingdom of God may really be established on earth and so that peace, contentment and well-being may fill the world as waters fill the oceans. The Islamic “way of life” is based on this unique approach to life and a peculiar concept of man’s place in the universe. That is why it is necessary that before we proceed to discuss the moral, social, political and economic systems of Islam, we should have a clear idea of the Islamic Concept of Life.”

    One of the most important contributions of Mawdudi in twentieth century Islam has been his presentation of Islam as a system of life, a complete code of conduct that governs all aspects of human existence. The basic proposition in Mawdudi’s theory is God’s exclusive sovereignty. According to him:

    “God’s sovereignty covers all aspects of political and legal sovereignty, also, and in these two no one other than God has any share. No monarch, no royal family, no elite class, no leader of any religious group, no democracy vested in the sovereignty of the people can participate in God’s sovereignty. Whosoever claims such a position is a rebel. Similarly, any institution or individual attempting to assume political and legal sovereignty and seeking thereby to restrict the jurisdiction of God to spheres of personal law or religious duties is a usurper and a rebel. The truth is that no one can claim to be a lawgiver, save under the dispensation of God. No one can challenge the supreme authority of God Almighty in any sphere.”

    Mawdudi’s concepts of an Islamic state reject any Western model. In his view, everything about Western civilization was wrong and harmful because it was not God-given but elaborated by political leaders on the basis of false beliefs. To him and his followers, the West had long ago denied the sovereignty of God. Therefore, all things its people have constructed are unacceptable.

    The works of Mawdudi were translated into Arabic and other languages as early as 1940. They exerted a profound influence on the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and in other Muslim countries. They helped shape contemporary militant fundamentalist movements.

    The Goal: Establishment of a Separate Muslim Society
    Mawdudi had as his goal the establishment of a separate Muslim society, not integration and/or assimilation into Western culture. The existence of such Muslim dominated ghettos as Clichy-sous-Bois and Bagneux outside Paris and Leicester in the U.K. are examples of lack of Muslim integration. These concepts also pervade the Islamic banking sector of the Major Money Center Banks, with the fact that the accounts from the Islamic windows may not be co-mingled with those of non-Muslims. For his part, Mawdudi appealed to the old notion of the universal Muslim community, the Ummah, which operates according to traditional principles of Islamic solidarity. Essentially undifferentiated except by gender, the Ummah is supposed to transcend tribal, national, regional, and local ties. Having its own laws, values, and convictions, it is to be the individual Muslim’s principal source of identity and the focus of his loyalty.

    The teaching of Mawdudi on no integration and/or assimilation into Western culture has far-reaching impact today on many of the issues being addressed in Europe. When immigrants came to America in its formative years, their goal was integration into a unified culture; this is what made America the strong nation it is. In Canada, the Muslim population has sought and has already achieved the separation by the creation of separate civil courts for Muslims. The goal of Islamists is the incremental Islamization of all countries and peoples.

    Ummah is an Arabic word that means “community” or “nation.” In the context of Islam, the word ummah is used in foreign languages as well as in Arabic to mean the “nation of the believers” (ummatu l-muminin), and thus the whole Muslim world. The phrase al-ummatun wahid in the Qur’an (the “One Community”) refers to the entire Muslim world unified. Some modern Islamists use the term Islamic Ummah or Muslim Ummah to refer to all the people in the lands and countries where predominantly Muslims reside, and which were once under the control of the Islamic caliphate.


    The Role of Jihad—Not to Conquer Lands But Islamization of Populations


    An intrinsic part of the Islamic faith is jihad. While modern Islamic scholars have endeavored to redefine jihad, claiming that it is primarily a struggle with self, history proves otherwise.

    A major, twofold fact transforms the jihad into something quite different from traditional wars, waged for ambition and self-interest, with limited objectives, where the “normal” situation is peace between peoples. War in itself constitutes a dramatic event, which must end in a return to peace. Jihad does not end. The twofold factor is first the religious nature, then the fact that war has become an institution and no longer an “event”. Jihad is a continuing religious duty.

    It is important to note that it is not the duty of Muslims primarily to conquer lands through Jihad but to Islamize the population.

    In Islam jihad is a religious obligation. It forms part of the duties that the believer must fulfill. It is Islam’s normal path to expansion.

    Hence, the second important specific characteristic is that the jihad is an institution—a process, and not an event; that is to say, it is part of the normal functioning of the Muslim world.

    The conquered populations change status (they become dhimmis), and the Shariah tends to be put into effect integrally, overthrowing the former law of the country. The conquered territories do not simply change “owners.” Rather, they are brought into a binding collective (religious) ideology--with the exception of the dhimmi condition--and are controlled by highly perfected administrative machinery.

    Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawi writes: “Jihad can be with the pen and the tongue, just as it can be with the sword and the spear. Islamic Jihad is not limited to military efforts only; it extends beyond this, including several means that Muslims need to utilize now more than ever.”


    The Question: What Is Islamic Ideology?


    Ideology is a philosophical term meaning “the science of ideas.” Again, idea is a subtle and very comprehensive term. For our present purpose, it is unnecessary to go into the details of the term. Suffice it to say that idea means “a basic concept,” and that the basic concepts on which any system is built constitutes its ideology. Since ideology presupposes the existence of a system, the question arises: Is Islam a system?

    Yes, Islam is a system. But unlike what most people in the West believe, Islam is not a religion in the ordinary sense of the word. Religion is the English equivalent for the Arabic word Mazhah, which does not occur even once in the whole of the Holy Qur’an. Instead, the Qur’an has used the word Addeen for Islam, which means “a particular way of life.”

    Islam is an ideology that claims divine authority in all religious, economic and political affairs of life. So naturally, it follows that Islam would be in direct conflict with democracy, capitalism, liberalism, socialism, and all the other non-Islamic systems of government, jurisprudence, and economics.

    “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is no democracy.” Abraham Lincoln

    The Importance of Islamic (Shariah) Law


    Shariah law is the key to understanding Islamic ideology, government, economics, and social institutions. It is the basis for Islamic fundamentalism’s disagreement with Western thought, and it encapsulates the ideology of Islam that is found in the Qur’an and the Sunnah.[16] Shariah brings Islamic theology down to a person’s everyday life. The objective of Islamic ideology is to have everyone in the world governed by Shariah law. Muslims believe this law expresses the universal will of Allah for humankind. They think they have a holy obligation to impose it upon all the nations of the world.

    As noted earlier, Islam is much more than a religion. Muslims themselves describe their faith by saying that Islam is a complete “way of life.” This is certainly a more apt description, because Islam is a religious, social, economic, educational, health, political, and philosophic way of life. In fact, Islam is an all-embracing socio-politico-religious utopian ideology that encompasses every field of human endeavor.


    In Islam there is no King but Allah


    According to Islamic Jurisprudence (Usul al Fiqh) --from an Islamic legal perspective, there is no king but Allah, and he is the supreme ruler and legislator of the world. This is significant, because since Allah is king, no earthly ruler has sufficient authority to legislate law. The reason for this is that sovereign authority belongs to Allah and his laws; those laws were revealed to Muhammad in the seventh century. Muslims believe that the Qur’an and the Sunnah are Allah’s final legislation for the world. Hence, according to true Islam, Shariah law is the only law with divine approval and authority for the nations of the world.

    The Qur’an itself states that Allah is the sovereign “King of Mankind.”

    Therefore exalted be Allah, the King, the Reality: there is no god but He, the Lord of the Throne of Honor! Qur’an 23:116 (Yusuf Ali’s translation)

    The Qur’an and the Sunnah are the Exclusive Foundations of Shariah Law for an Islamic State
    The Qur’an disposes of all jurisprudence outside the Qur’an and the Sunnah. The days of ignorance (jahiliya) refer to the times before Muhammad. Some Muslims argued that the verse in the Qur’an 5:50 negates all laws that were legislated on the basis of non-Islamic principles. The result is that no one may appeal to judicial precedence outside of the Qur’an and the Sunnah. From a Muslim’s perspective, Allah revealed his divine law in the Qur’an and in the life of Muhammad. As a result of this divine revelation, the so-called human laws of the nations have been abrogated by Muhammad’s revelation. In fact, it is rebellion against Allah’s supremacy to submit to a human law after Allah has issued afresh the divine code of conduct for humankind.

    Do they then seek after a judgment of (the days of) ignorance? But who, for a people whose faith is assured, can give better judgment than Allah? Qur'an 5:50 (Yusuf Ali’s translation)

    In addition, the Qur’an asserts that those who say they believe in the revelations that came before Muhammad wish to resort to the judgments of the Evil One (Satan), who seeks to lead humankind astray. The important revelations that came before Muhammad were the Old and New Testaments, and those who believed in these revelations were the Jews and Christians. Now notice Muhammad’s next move. Essentially, Muhammad said that religious hypocrites appeal to the Evil One when they seek the judgments of prior revelations.

    Hast thou not turned Thy vision to those who declare that they believe in the revelations that have come to thee and to those before thee? Their (real) wish is to resort together for judgment (in their disputes) to the Evil One, though they were ordered to reject him. But Satan’s wish is to lead them astray far away (from the right). Qur’an 4:60 (Yusuf Ali’s translation)

    Hence, Muhammad abrogated all the prior prophets of Allah. And the Qur'an teaches that resorting to the judgments of prior revelations was resorting to Satan’s judgments and wishes. Muslims believe that the only divine message that is valid is what Muhammad gave centuries ago. Thus, they believe the choice is between the rule of Allah and the rule of Satan. And it is turning to Satan to appeal to revelations that came before the Qur’an. The Qur’an and the Sunnah must be the exclusive foundation of law.

    Islamic ideology asserts that Muslims are the most highly evolved specimens of humanity. Their advanced evolutionary state places them on a higher plane than everyone else, and it burdens them with the special duty of enjoining humanity to attain a divine standard of morality.

    The “People of the Book” – Jews and Christians are Perverted Transgressors


    For Muslims engaged in imposing Islam upon the world, the “People of the Book” (Jews and Christians) will be the people who make their task most difficult, because most Jews and Christians, according to the Qur’an, are perverted transgressors. So while Muslims seek to promote the right and forbid the wrong, Muhammad believed that the People of the Book would confront the Islamic message with perversions and falsehoods. He felt that Jews and Christians would be the ones who would prove to be the most opposed to an Islamic government with its Qur’anic constitution and Shariah legal system.

    Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith, it were best for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors. Qur’an 3:111 (Yusuf Ali’s translation)

    Essentially, Muslims believe that a democratic system of government is an evil legal system, because its fundamental principle is that man is sovereign over his affairs. This principle conflicts with the principle that Allah is sovereign “King of the Worlds.” Orthodox Muslims argue that only Islam recognizes Allah’s divine right to rule.

    If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good). Qur’an 3:85 (Yusuf Ali’s translation)

     

    The Goals of Implementing Shariah Law


    The goals of Islamists in establishing an economic system based on Islamic law (the Shariah) are:

    ·         To establish credibility for Islam as a “way of life” equal to all other economic and religious doctrines

    ·         To establish an economic system that allows control of the financial, natural resources and intellectual properties by a totalitarian, non-elected hierarchy justified on the basis of religious law--the Qur’an

    ·         To bring together the global economic resources of Islamic Ummah to influence the world opinion and provide the funding for proselytizing (Da’wa) of non-believers

    ·         To establish an economic system not based on scientific principles but on religious beliefs

     


    In Islam Women are Inferior to Men


    In Islam, women are inferior to men. According to the Qur’an: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property [for the support of women]. So good women are obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded.

    As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great. Qur’an 4:34

    No alternative quotations or excuses can prove otherwise. Recent figures from the International Labor Organization, published by the World Bank, indicate that in the Middle East and North Africa, women comprise 28 percent of the total labor force, whereas the world average is 40 percent. As a group, these countries have the lowest female labor force participation rate in the world. One of the lowest figures is Saudi Arabia, with 16 percent. As distance from the Arabian Peninsula increases, so does the proportion of women in the labor force. In Pakistan, the figure is 28.6 percent, whereas in Bangladesh and Indonesia, the figures are close to world average. This is a reflection of cultural values regarding women in Muslim countries, values inseparable from religious values. It is also associated with higher birth rate in these countries. This religiously prescribed role for women in society has profound economic consequences.

    The major economic impact of low female participation is due to the fact that one-income families have lower incomes than two income families. If these women were engaged in paid employment, increasing the labor force by 30 percent, it is not unreasonable to assume there would be an additional contribution to national income of around 10 percent. Whatever the figure may be, if a large proportion of the potential workforce does not work, total national income is reduced by a considerable amount. Furthermore, this is a percentage of national income that is forgone every year. This relative income loss persists every year. Therefore, income continually forgone represents an accumulating loss in potential national prosperity.

    The limitation on the labor force participation of women reduces potential production and income. The role of women in Islamic society, with its focus on domestic responsibilities, may lead to a high birth rate and population growth rate, and a correspondingly lower per-capita income growth rate, further contributing to relative poverty. The role prescribed for women in Islam, as outlined in the Qur’an, conforms to Arabic customs in the seventh century. It does not conform to modern standards of equality and objections to sexism. Discrimination against women also contravenes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international agreements. It also contravenes modern standards of morality.


    Food and Drink


    The Islamic dietary laws are called halal, also the term given to permitted foods. Food and drink that are prohibited under Islamic law are known as haram. For a product to be allowable, it must conform to Islamic law in a number of ways. First, it must be free of any substance or ingredient taken or extracted from a haram animal or ingredient. Second, the food must be made, manufactured and stored by using equipment and machinery that have been cleansed according to Islamic law. The food must have never come into contact with a haram substance. According to Islamic law, haram is:

    ·         Any type of pig, dog, donkey or carnivore

    ·         Animals having protruding canine teeth, such as monkeys, cats, and lions

    ·         Amphibious animals such as frogs, crocodiles, and turtles

    ·         Undesirable insects such as worms, flies, and cockroaches

    ·         Birds of prey with talons such as owls, and eagles

    ·         Animals that have died as a result of strangulation, a head injury, being attacked by another animal, or natural causes

    ·         Alcohol and other harmful substances, including poisonous and intoxicating plants or any addictive substance

    ·         Blood

    From a business perspective, these laws can be viewed as product and production restrictions. The alcohol and beverage industry would certainly be limited. It would still be possible to market alcohol-free beer; however, typical advertisement campaigns involving women would need to be drastically changed. Stimulating drinks, such as tea and coffee, have fallen into a more gray area under these restrictions. Although they are not explicitly banned under the haram, those who believe very strongly in the religion frown upon these products. With only one example, it is clear that these lifestyle restrictions have far-reaching business implications.


    The Strategy for World Domination

    The strategy of the Islamists is to organize the youth, control the natural resources, pool all financial resources, collect the zakat (tithe) to fund the venture, establish big enough trading blocks, put the enemy into hock, create fear, and promote multiculturalism. It is also to promote human rights and political correctness in the enemy camp to prevent an dissenting view, control the press, control the currency, make the laws of all nations and organization compatible, control the organizational structure of companies, bring the organizations under umbrella organization, control commerce with trade agreements, and equally important, gain alliances with common goals or hates. Then they will be able to control the world and bring all under Allah’s will.

    Never before in history has a religion group attempted to do the following:

    ·         Create a transnational block of countries coordinated with central planning, strategy and purpose guided by religious leaders, in this case, imams. The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) is composed of fifty-six countries, plus the observers, which include Russia

    ·         Create a central bank, the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) and the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB)

    ·         Establish a mega-Islamic bank with global reach and financing backed by the IDB

    ·         Establish an interlinked merchandise trading system and a trading block with Free Trade Agreements with other blocks

    ·         Centralize the wealth of all people of one faith in financial institutions under the direction and management of religious leaders as is occurring in the Money Center Banks with their Shariah Advisory Boards.

    ·         Centralize and mandate the contribution of tithe (zakat) and direct the funds for economic gain, political action and proselytizing non-Muslims

    ·         Create a monetary union: the AGCC Monetary Union allows Euro-Arab economic and financial integration

    ·         Create a new currency, the gold dinar[18]

    ·         Control the major transportation systems—Ports (Dubai World Ports), shipping and control of oil transit choke points


    David J. Jonsson is the author of Clash of Ideologies —The Making of the Christian and Islamic Worlds, Xulon Press 2005. His new book: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance (Salem Communications (May 30, 2006).

    =====

     

     

     

     

    http://groups.msn.com/Moncton101
    http://moncton101.spaces.live.com
    http://groups.msn.com/MonctonsSingleAdults
    http://groups.msn.com/NBsingles
    http://groups.msn.com/LifelineGreaterMoncton 

    crime beat, police beat, Moncton, greater Moncton, Moncton101, atlantic Canada, Halifax, Fredericton, Saint John, Dartmouth   

                                     
    Buy, sell, trade, Give away & Looking for,Yard & Garage Sales, Coupon Exchange, Local Events, 4 & 2 Rent, People Locater, F.Y.I., Crime Beat, Promote your abilities, And much more.

    120


    Keeping you informed, entertained and amused..

    Moncton.net archives-http://www.moncton.net/canadian%2Ddiscussions/


    Moncton.net Chat-http://www.moncton.net/e/chat.aspx


    "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
    - Albert Einstein -

  •  02-20-2007, 6:20 AM